SEARCH
0-9 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Prev | Current Page 129 | Next

Reilly, S. A.

"Our Legal Heritage : 600-1776 King Aehelbert - King George III"

They continued to transact their business
in the English language.
The local jurisdictions of thegns who had grants of sac and soke
or who exercised judicial functions among their free neighbors
were now called "manors" under their new owners, who conducted a
manor court.
The Conquerer's Royal Court was called the "Curia Regis". When the
Conquerer wished to determine the national laws, he summoned
twelve elected representatives of each county to declare on oath
the ancient lawful customs and law as they existed in the time of
the popular King Edward the Confessor. The recording of this law
was begun. A person could spend months trying to catch up with the
Royal Court to present a case. Sometimes the Conquerer sent the
justiciar or commissioners to hold his Royal Court in the various
districts. The commissioner appointed groups of local men to give
a collective verdict upon oath for each trial he conducted. The
Conquerer allowed, on an ad hoc basis, certain high-level people
such as bishops and abbots and those who made a large payment, to
have land disputes decided by an inquiry of recognitors. Besides
royal issues, the Curia Regis heard appeals from lower court
decisions. It used English, Norman, feudal, Roman, and canon law
legal principles to reach a decision, and was flexible and
expeditious.
A dispute between a Norman and an English man over land or a
criminal act could be decided by trial by combat [battle].


Pages:
117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141